Photo above shows the Desktop of @Macarlo's Warp 4 FP12. Note the CPU usage - only 5% running Alpha, Boxer and Embellish with PM Patrol and Object Desktop Professional 1.52 started until Control+Alt+Del Commander 2.5 from Perez Computing Services.

SPECIAL EXCLUSIVE REPORT
OS/2 Warp Client 4.0 FP12
Runs Rather Than Win 2000

In Affiliation CNET News.com with CNET, Inc.

=@MACARLO MICROSOFT=  =@MACARLO YAHOO=  =@MACARLO WEBALIAS=  =@MACARLO ALTAVISTA=

 


In Affiliation with Beyond.com

 By @Macarlo
Team OS/2 Registered
Win 2000 Beta Tester
Screenshots by Embellish and PMJPEG


Hi Gang.
I updated yesterday my OS/2 Warp 4.0 FP6 Java 1.1.6 to FP12, Java 1.1.8 fixed (the most recent runtime), new MTPS and TCPIP 4.1 (with the latest fix) in order to work in site publishing using StarOffice 5.1a (by Sun Microsystems, Inc.). Today I created and updated dozens of pages in my principal web site (actually containing above 5,000 pages) and I finally can appraise correctly the SO 5.1a performance on Warp platform). Sincerely man I can said that OS/2 Warp Client 4 FP12 in a Pentium 200 with 128MB RAM (my machine exclusively for tests) runs rather than Windows 2000 Professional. In the photo below you can see StarOffice 5.1a starting just fine on my new OS/2!


 The successfully update history

I'm using OS/2 since the firsts versions because I encountered problems with Windows 3.0 and above to write, illustrate and print books using Aldus Page Maker. At 1997 I migrated from the paper to the web and during two years I used Boxer text editor by David Hamel (ASP member) and Home Page Publisher web authoring tool by Jean-Bernard Clerin. I build several web sites inclusively this where this report is published using this tools. For all works with images I used (and follow using today!) Embellish from the deceased Dadaware and this also fantastic image viewer that is PMJPEG from PixVision. During this time I registered 212 OSA/2 native applications, through BMT Micro, Inc, Indelible Blue, Digital River, Norloff BBS, JMS and directly in dozens developers as PillarSoft (WarpZip), TrueSpectra (PhotoGraphics Pro), PKWARE , Stardock, Boxer Software, SemWare, Southside, WarpSpeed Computers (Chris Graham)
etc etc etc.


During this years I really enjoyed work using OS/2 and I saw that it is the operating system more stable, firm, solid, fixed, durable, steady and enduring that exist in all the world, including all UNIX, Mac OS and Windows NT. Incredible man, but it just the true: my OS/2 Warp 4.0 installed at 1997 in a little Quantum 520MB HDD was moved with Partition Magic to a Western Digital Caviar 2.5GB and moved in pursuing with DriveCopy to a Maxtor Diamond 6.2GB and I never reinstalled it uuntil yesterday February 10, 2000!!! During this period I enjoyed absolute stability without crashes and without any problem. What is the other operating system than can offer this performance? UNIX? No, man, I'm UNIX user and I can said: OS/2 Warp is the most perfect operating system build and runs rather than UNIX!


II entered in the year 2000 with 450 applications and tools running just fine on this fantastic Warp platform. Unfortunately IBM decided turn orphan the OS/2 Client because is not interested in improve operating systems for SOHO users. IBM actually is a partner of Microsoft an recently purchased 300,000 Windows 2000 licenses. I joined the Microsoft Beta Testers Team and tested exhaustively Windows 2000, build on NT technology. Windows 2000 (a.k.a. NT 5.0) Professional is the workstation of this "new"platform and Windows 2000 Server is the "mini-mainframe"for corporate use, pointed by the experts as the ideal platform for all downsizings. Windows 2000 is really an excellent OS, runs rather than Windows NT 4.0 with the latest Fix (SP6), but its hardware exigencies are simply dramatic! More expensive this hardware cost for all the people today!


Comparing the OS/2 Warp Client 4.0 FP12 performance on a Pentium 200 with the Windows 2000 performance on the same machine I verified that OS/2 runs much more fast and efficient, with much more stability! I updated my OS/2 Client to this latest level because I noted that the performance of StarOffice 5.1a definitely is no good if the user are running with Java 1.1.6 as I was running! StarOffice 5.0, released by StarDivision, runs fast and smooth on Warp 4 FP6 but unfortunately generates serious bugs in HTML: links and tags are replicated and resulted dirty code; everyday you must be clean it using TSE (The SemWare Editor for Programmers') with some macros in order to depurate it. Much time are expended and the productivity declines.


I decided use StarOffice on OS/2 because I must update dozens pages at the same time on my web site everyday and the manually work with Boxer on HTML is impracticable. Home Page Publisher is a nice tool but read each 100K in separate and don't recognizes the latest HTML level generating troubleshooting and several problems. If you are owner of a little web site with 20 or 30 pages, O.K., you can use HPP without problems. But if you are owner of a web site with thousands pages and sophisticated project, updated everyday, say good bye to HPP man! The other decent alternative for OS/2 users (because Netscape Composer, sincerely, is indecent!) is simply obsolete: I'm talking about HTML Studio by Panacea (I'm registered user).


The problem was that I tried update my Warp with Java 1.1.8 this Java simply don't install!!! I tried dozens times, the install program said that "the installation is concluded" but nothing, absolutely nothing was installed! But I have to do this because running on Java 1.1.,6 StarOffice 5.1a - that have not the reported bugs in HTML - consumed simply 95 to 100% of the CPU resources of my test machine! Talking with Basil Fernie in the Supersite OS/2 Users Mailing List he reported that his StarOffice 5.1 was running fine on OS/2 because he is using the latest Java and have applied the most recent fix. A friend from the OS/2 Brazil Mailing List, the computer guru Sandro Coana, sent me a CD with FP12 and Java 1.1.8 with the most recent runtime. At this time I was using StarOffice 5.1 by StarDivision and another brazilian computer guru, Renee Senger, suggested that I experienced the Sun release (5.1a). I tried it, the performance was increased, but excessive RAM was consumed and high CPU usage was detected by PM Patrol and by Object Desktop Professional Control Center. Finally, talking with another brazilian computer guru and programmer, Daniel Jorge Caetano, author of Autoget (Fudeba Software), he suggested that I reinstall my Warp. "I had the same problem here and solved it quickly installing the GA and applying FP12 by RSU; in this environment Java 1.1.8 installs fine, without any problem", said Caetano.


I decided follow Daniel Caetano instructions by my nightmare is the big number of applications installed on my OS/2, the complicated and sophisticated desktop configuration etc etc etc. But I solved quickly this problems and in only one hour 45 minutes my new super OS/2 Warp is running fine!!! Here is the steeps I followed:



Photo above corroborates: OS/2 Warp 4 FP6 moves an entire web site from a partition to another using only 23% of CPU resources. This operation is performed by my principal file manager, FileStar/2, build by the old GammaTech (SoftTouch).


Finally, man, I'm making this review on my new and fantastic OS/2 Warp FP12, Java 1.1.8, TCPIP 4.1 using StarWriter from StarOffice 5.1a, consuming only around 28% of my CPU resources!!! To access the Net I simply moved Injoy 2.2 and another 449 applications and tools from drive H to drive C and clicked the injoy.exe! (obviously I returned this 900MB of applications to C before command the desktop reconstruction (I preserved the ODP snapshot in a separate directory in H and purged the INIs using TIE).

Yeahh, this old and good OS/2 is running here rather than Windows 2000, man. If you don't believe, try by yourself and see! Warp 4 FP12 is the ultimate workstation for all users that uses computers for serious works! With StarOffice one of the most complicated problems of OS/2 - the clipboard interactivity - is definitely solved and you can enjoy the advantages of a real multitask in a solid operating system. This is not another fantastic history about super Oss made in Redmond: its the true, man, from Austin, although some execs...!

RELATED STORIES
StarOffice 5.1a by Sun Runs Fine on OS/2
Is Your StarOffice 5.1 Running Slow on OS/2?

 


Compare prices on more than 100,000 products!

Search our product directory.

 

CNET Shopper. Click here.

@Macarlo, Inc.
@Macarlo's Shareware & Web
OS/2
Java Lobby Member
Java Site Accredited

[TOP] [HOME] [INDEX]